IM体育下载官方入口
Defenses For Accusations Of DUI / OVI ‘Per Se’ In Ohio
In Ohio, it is
per se
(“by itself”) illegal to operate a vehicle with a prohibited concentration of alcohol and/or drugs in the driver’s breath, blood or urine. If a driver’s alcohol or drug level is ‘over the limit’ while operating a vehicle, the driver is guilty of DUI / OVI ‘Per Se’, even if the alcohol and/or drug(s) did not impair the driver’s ability to operate the vehicle.
To prove the driver’s alcohol and/or drug level was ‘over the limit’, the prosecution will introduce the results of a breath test, blood test, or urine test. The defenses to DUI / OVI ‘Per Se’ generally aim to exclude the test results from evidence or explain why the test results were inaccurate.
Top 50 Defenses To DUI / OVI ‘Per Se’ In Ohio
The im体育在线直播 lawyers represent clients charged with DUI / OVI in Columbus and Central Ohio. Our lawyers developed
The Top 100 Ohio DUI / OVI Defenses
©: a list of the top, but not all, defenses. Half of those defenses relate to the charge of DUI / OVI ‘Impaired’, and half of those defenses relate to the charge of DUI / OVI ‘Per Se’. Some of the defenses for ‘Per Se’ charges are asserted in cases involving breath tests, some of the defenses are used in cases involving blood/urine tests, and some defenses apply to all three types of tests. The top 50 defenses for DUI / OVI ‘Per Se’ are listed below.
Breath Tests
-
Test result does not prove BAC was ‘over the limit’ at the time of operating the vehicle due to rising BAC
-
Driver’s breath temperature was not measured, and breath temperature changes result of test
-
Driver’s breathing pattern affected test result
-
Cell phone in area of breath test caused radio frequency interference
-
Breath-testing machine plugged into outlet with other electrical devices
-
Driver had foreign substance in mouth at time of breath test
-
Medical condition affected accuracy of test
-
Ambient air contained alcohol which inflated test result
-
Breath-testing machine not properly maintained
-
Officer did not conduct 20-minute observation period before test
-
Invalid sample not followed by 20-minute observation period
-
Records for breath-testing machine not maintained for three years
-
Instrument check not performed every seven days
-
Instrument check did not yield valid result
-
Radio frequency interference check not performed every seven days
-
Instrument check solution used beyond expiration date
-
Instrument check solution not refrigerated when not in use
-
Instrument check solution container not retained for prescribed period
-
Breath test operator did not have valid permit
-
Breath-testing machine senior operator for maintenance did not have valid permit
-
Breath-testing machine not in proper working order
Blood & Urine Tests
-
No search warrant and no exception to search warrant requirement
-
Defective search warrant
-
Procedure manual for test not on file in analytical testing area
-
Procedures used by laboratory not scientifically valid
-
Procedures for analytical testing not followed
-
Technique used for testing not approved by Ohio Department of Health
-
Instrument(s) used for testing were not calibrated daily
-
Instrument(s) used for testing failed calibration
-
Laboratory records not maintained for prescribed period
-
Sample not refrigerated when not in transit
-
Sample not sealed and labeled as required by Ohio Department of Health
-
Chain of custody for sample not properly documented and retained
-
Sample not retained for additional testing
-
Laboratory did not successfully complete national proficiency testing program
-
Analyst did not have a valid laboratory technician or director permit
-
Laboratory report inadequate
-
Medical condition affected result of test
-
Medication affected result of test
-
Analyst error in testing sequence
-
Instrument used for testing has internal contamination
-
Balance instruments not calibrated
-
Internal standards, standards, and controls invalid
-
Uncertainty in measurement not calculated
-
Mass spectrometer spectral library used for confirmation invalid
-
Blood draw not conducted by qualified individual
-
Blood draw not conducted with sterile dry needle into vacuum container
-
Blood collected in container without solid anticoagulant
-
Urine sample not collected in accordance with Ohio regulations
-
Urine alcohol level at time of operating vehicle was below the ‘legal limit’ due to pooling of alcohol in urine
Law Firm For DUI / OVI ‘Per Se’ Cases
The lawyers at the im体育在线直播 understand how to present defenses related to DUI / OVI ‘Per Se’. If you are seeking representation for this type of case in Columbus or Central Ohio, a free phone consultation can be arranged by completing a
CONTACT FORM
or by calling our office at
614-717-1177
.
OVI / DUI 'Impaired' Defenses In Ohio
OVI / DUI Defenses
Testimonials
★★★★★
"Shawn is a wonderful person and an elite attorney. Being represented by him gives you complete peace of mind knowing you are in good hands, with..."
M.A.
★★★★★
"Shawn Dominy quickly displayed his expertise in defending OVI cases at a level that made me immediately comfortable in my decision to..."
K.G.
★★★★★
"I was looking at a Physical control OVI charge. License suspension, 3 day class, all that. Shawn got it reduced to persistent disorderly conduct. I paid a fine, saw..."
Y.E.